<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad, Better and Best of YouTubed Choreography</title>
	<link>http://oddorama.com/2007/12/14/bad-better-and-best-of-youtubed-choreography/</link>
	<description>Odd, Weird, Interesting and Everything In Between</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://oddorama.com/2007/12/14/bad-better-and-best-of-youtubed-choreography/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oddorama.com/2007/12/14/bad-better-and-best-of-youtubed-choreography/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I was unable to comment on  the "Hollow Earth" post, so I am posting my comment here:

Actually, this can be scientifically proved incorrect, without any digging - because we know the attraction of an object to the Earth at surface of the Earth and the gravitational constant G, the mass and density of the Earth can be calculated. The implication of this is that once we know the size, density, and mass of the Earth, the idea of a hollow Earth is easily debunked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was unable to comment on  the &#8220;Hollow Earth&#8221; post, so I am posting my comment here:</p>
<p>Actually, this can be scientifically proved incorrect, without any digging - because we know the attraction of an object to the Earth at surface of the Earth and the gravitational constant G, the mass and density of the Earth can be calculated. The implication of this is that once we know the size, density, and mass of the Earth, the idea of a hollow Earth is easily debunked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
